{"id":444,"date":"2007-12-13T21:38:30","date_gmt":"2007-12-13T21:38:30","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/astraea.net\/blog\/?p=444"},"modified":"2008-07-06T21:58:28","modified_gmt":"2008-07-06T21:58:28","slug":"how-to-save-the-planet","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.astraea.net\/blog\/how-to-save-the-planet\/","title":{"rendered":"How to save the planet &#8230;"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>I had to post this because we decided to follow the three initial proposals about 10 years ago.  We&#8217;re about 80% of the way there, but wish a few more of you would join in.  \ud83d\ude42<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<h1>Carbon myths<\/h1>\n<p>Recycling and banning plastic bags are all very well, but    they won&#8217;t save the planet. Instead, we should fly less, go vegan and insulate    the loft, says Chris Goodall<\/p>\n<ul class=\"article-attributes no-pic\">\n<li class=\"byline\">Chris Goodall<\/li>\n<li class=\"publication\">The Guardian<\/li>\n<li class=\"date\">Thursday December 13 2007<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>The global warming consequences of our personal actions are    usually invisible to us. We have no easy means of knowing how our way of life    generates carbon dioxide and other climate-changing gases. It is far from    obvious that it takes more energy to produce a paper bag than its plastic    equivalent, or that extra loft insulation usually reduces gas consumption more    than solar panels. Unsurprisingly, this means that most of us are ignorant    about what really matters, which makes us vulnerable to comforting    half-truths. These myths are a problem in themselves because they discourage    us from addressing the important sources of emissions. But our ignorance also    encourages businesses to promote goods and services that offer little or no    carbon-saving.<\/p>\n<p>So, for example, when British people are asked in surveys about the actions    they can take to be more responsible about global warming, domestic recycling    always comes top. Reducing air travel comes far down the list. But the global    warming impact of our Mediterranean holidays is hundreds of times more than    the toll from not recycling. We see the plastics going into the dustbin every    week, but pollutants from jet engines are hidden. So people who carefully sort    their recycling every week continue to fly. And businesses that are trying to    be ethical devote more effort to reducing packaging than getting their    employees to travel less.<\/p>\n<p>We like our myths. Suggesting that British league football isn&#8217;t the best    in the world or that Monty Python wasn&#8217;t always funny is a quick way to start    an argument and lose friends. But some of our cherished carbon myths are    dangerously counterproductive. Here is my list of the most common:<\/p>\n<p>I like low-energy lightbulbs. In fact, I sell them at the local farmers&#8217;    market to offset my personal carbon sins. But even if a householder replaces    all their bulbs, the total impact on yearly electricity consumption is likely    to be no more than about 400 units (kWh) of electricity. A new plasma TV    bought at the same time will outweigh any energy savings. The government talks    about banning old-style bulbs, but no one dares mention the explosive impact    on energy consumption of the latest generation of large TVs and games    consoles. The power used by these monsters embarrasses their manufacturers and    the online brochures usually omit all details of electricity use. I couldn&#8217;t    find a single retailer that dares to list the power consumption of plasma TVs.    The best rule for cutting home electricity consumption? Keep your old TV. If    you still feel the need to buy something, get a new super-efficient fridge.<\/p>\n<p>Nothing arouses fury like the disposable plastic supermarket bag. Gordon    Brown singled them out in his first speech on climate change as prime    minister. The widespread hatred now extends to almost all plastic food    packaging. But although plastic bags are detestable, they are almost    irrelevant to climate change. Each of us uses about 2kg a year of shopping    bags, and they perform multiple useful functions in the home after they have    carried our shopping from the supermarket. Food packaging of all types is no    more than 5% of the weight of our groceries. Wasted food, which rots in    landfill and generates methane, is a far more serious cause of global warming.    Rather than getting our retailers to strip the 3g of protective polythene from    our cucumbers, we need to concentrate on reducing the 30% of food that goes to    waste every week.<\/p>\n<p>There is nothing wrong with hybrid petrol\/electric cars. But they are an    extraordinarily expensive way of avoiding emissions. The Toyota Prius may be    lovely, but its emissions are no better than the latest generation of small    diesels, which cost little more than half the price. Buy a small car instead    and spend the savings on insulating your walls. It will have far more effect.    Worried about the effect on your status of driving a small car? Buy an    electric vehicle and people will simply think of you as eccentric.<\/p>\n<p>It makes sense to avoid unnecessary transport of food. Local food is    fresher and probably healthier, and your purchase contributes to the local    economy. But food transport, unless it is by air, is usually a relatively    small part of a meal&#8217;s carbon impact. Reducing the amount of meat you eat has    far more effect than deciding to buy locally. A kilo of beef from the farm    next door will have 50 times the global warming effect of a can of beans    shipped from Canada. Taking a few steps towards a vegan diet will reduce    carbon emissions far more than local purchasing. Avoiding meat and also buying    locally is better still.<\/p>\n<p>Politicians extol the virtues of domestic generation of electricity. The    Conservatives and Liberal Democrats have committed themselves to paying us 45p    a unit for electricity from the solar panels on our roof, about 10 times the    wholesale price paid to the large, coal-fired Drax power station, in North    Yorkshire. Microgeneration may be fashionable, but it is an astonishingly    expensive way of reducing emissions. Less glamorous, but more effective, would    be a plan to put a \u00a320 note in the centre of every roll of loft insulation.    British houses are the worst insulated in northern Europe and subsidised    insulation would cut emissions far more cheaply than encouraging wind turbines    or solar photovoltaic panels<\/p>\n<p><strong>Myth 1 <\/strong>Eco lightbulbs are the best way to save electricity    at home<br \/>\n<strong>Myth 2 <\/strong>Flying is responsible for only 2% of    carbon dioxide emissions<br \/>\n<strong>Myth 3 <\/strong>All packaging is wicked<br \/>\n<strong>Myth 4 <\/strong>Hybrid cars are the way forward<br \/>\n<strong>Myth 5    <\/strong>Avoid food miles<br \/>\n<strong>Myth 6 <\/strong>Microgeneration is a    good way for Britain to cut emissions<\/p>\n<p><strong>\u00b7 <\/strong>Chris Goodall is the author of How to Live a Low Carbon    Life (Earthscan) and founder of <a href=\"http:\/\/www.carboncommentary.com\/\">carboncommentary.com<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I had to post this because we decided to follow the three initial proposals about 10 years ago. We&#8217;re about 80% of the way there, but wish a few more of you would join in. \ud83d\ude42 Carbon myths Recycling and banning plastic bags are all very well, but they won&#8217;t save the planet. Instead, we &hellip;<br \/><a href=\"https:\/\/www.astraea.net\/blog\/how-to-save-the-planet\/\" class=\"more-link pen_button pen_element_default pen_icon_arrow_double\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">How to save the planet &#8230;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[7,22],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-444","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-climatechange","category-living"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p4hwcd-7a","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.astraea.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/444","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.astraea.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.astraea.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.astraea.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.astraea.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=444"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.astraea.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/444\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.astraea.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=444"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.astraea.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=444"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.astraea.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=444"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}